Legal Opinion

Carofino v. Forester

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided August 31, 2006No. 03 Civ. 6258(PKL)PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

LEISURE, District Judge.

This is a diversity action for medical malpractice, fraud, and unjust enrichment. Plaintiffs Jonathan Carofino (“Jonathan”) and his father George T. Carofino (“George”), both residents of Connecticut, allege that Jonathan’s psychiatrist, defendant Bruce M. Forester, M.D., a resident of New York, failed to (1) properly diagnose, and in fact misdiagnosed, Jonathan’s condition; (2) provide proper, and in fact provided improper, psychiatric treatment; and (3) prescribe proper, and in fact prescribed improper, medication. They further allege that defendant…

2Cases cited48 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Carol A. Gallo v. Prudential Residential Services, Limited Partnership, Doing Business as Prudential Relocation ManagementCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
  5. Luce v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Brady v. Basic Research, L.L.C.District Court, E.D. New York · 2015
  2. Broker Genius, Inc. v. VolponeDistrict Court, S.D. Illinois · 2018
  3. Passiglia v. Northwell Health, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2017
  4. Montanez v. City of SyracuseDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API