Bank of America, NA v. Owens
Washington Supreme Court
1DissentJ.M. Johnson, J.
¶30 (dissenting in part) — I join the majority in holding the “Supplemental Decree of Dissolution” entitled Kenneth Treiger to one-half of the proceeds of the Maplewood property sale before satisfaction of Bank of America’s lien. I dissent in part because I would also hold that under RCW 4.64.030(3), a judgment that fails to contain the summary required by RCW 4.64.030 lacks legal effect. Documents 1375 and 1376 do not comply.
¶31 As the majority accurately recognizes, a judgment is typically “entered” and effective from the time it is delivered to the clerk for filing. CR 58(b). The majority…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Connecticut National Bank v. GermainSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Whatcom County v. City of BellinghamWashington Supreme Court · 1996
- Tunstall v. BergesonWashington Supreme Court · 2000
- Bowie v. Department of RevenueWashington Supreme Court · 2011
- Reif v. LafolletteWashington Supreme Court · 1943