Legal Opinion
Balderas v. Tiny Lab Productions
District Court, D. New Mexico
Decided February 2, 2021No. 1:18-cv-00854Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO STATE OF NEW MEXICO EX REL. HECTOR BALDERAS, ATTORNEY GENERAL, Plaintiff, v. No. 18-854 MV/JFR TINY LAB PRODUCTIONS; TWITTER INC.; MOPUB, INC.; GOOGLE, INC.; ADMOB, INC.; AERSERV LLC; INMOBI PTE LTD.; APPLOVIN CORPORATION; and IRONSOURCE USA, INC. Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER THIS MATTER comes before the Court on Defendant Google’s1 Motion for Reconsideration or, in the Alternative, Interlocutory Appellate Review and Stay (“Motion for Reconsideration”) [Doc. 93]. The Court, having considered the motion, briefs, and relevant law,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Christianson v. Colt Industries Operating Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Servants of the Paraclete v. DoesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2000
- George Lambert, D/B/A Rainbow Fruit v. Sam Kysar and Joan Kysar, D/B/A Lewis River Tree FarmCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1993
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.