Commonwealth v. Derk
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION BY JOYCE, J:
¶ 1 In these consolidated appeals, Appellants Misty Derk and Kurt Bingaman each appeal their judgments of sentence entered March 29, and March 3, 2005, respectively, in the Court of Common Pleas of Snyder County. They both contend that the trial court erred in requiring them to submit a deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) sample to be stored in a DNA data bank and pay a mandatory cost of $250. These provisions were ordered pursuant to 44 Pa.C.S.A. §§ 2301-2336 (hereinafter the “DNA Act” or “Act”), relating to DNA data and testing. 1 After careful review, we find that the trial…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Kennedy v. Mendoza-MartinezSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Flemming v. NestorSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Smith v. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- United States v. WardSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Commonwealth v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- State v. Tabitha A. ScruggsWisconsin Supreme Court · 2017
- Commonwealth v. RoseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
- State v. RadajCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2015
- State v. ScruggsCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2015
- Shepard v. HoustonNebraska Supreme Court · 2014
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.