Legal Opinion
Bank of Montreal v. Federal National Bank & Trust Co.
District Court, W.D. Oklahoma
Decided May 30, 1984No. CIV 83-261-RPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
DAVID L. RUSSELL, District Judge.
The Plaintiff, Bank of Montreal, brought this action to enforce a letter of credit against the Defendants, Federal National Bank and Trust and Harris Trust and Savings Bank. Barton Valve was permitted to intervene as a party defendant and promptly filed a counterclaim for declaratory judgment against the Bank of Montreal. The case is presently at issue on cross Motions for Summary Judgment on the Plaintiff’s claim.
The relevant facts are not in dispute. Barton Valve sought financial aid from the Bank of Montreal for its business associates Blow Out…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Venizelos, S.A. v. Chase Manhattan BankCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1970
- Far Eastern Textile, Ltd. v. City National Bank & Trust Co.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 1977
- Savage v. First Nat. Bank & Trust Co. of TulsaDistrict Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 1976
- Harvey Estes Const. Co. v. DRY DOCK SAVINGS BANK OF NYDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1974
3Cited by5 opinions
- First State Bank v. Diamond Plastics Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1995
- Seattle-First National Bank v. Federal Deposit InsuranceDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1985
- Ocean Bank v. LA ESQUINA PRESIDENCIALDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1993
- First State Bank v. Diamond Plastics Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1995
- United States v. State Water Resources Control BoardDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2019