Legal Opinion

Board of Commissioners v. Gibson

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided May 13, 1924No. 18170PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAllen, J.

Two legal questions are involved in this ease: First. Does an appeal lie from an order of county commissioners vacating part of a county road? Second. Who is an interested party who may prosecute such an appeal, if the appeal lies?

The provisions of the statute under consideration are to be found in ¡Section 6860 et seq_., General Code (106 Ohio Laws 574). These sections, among other provisions, place in the county commissioners the power to locate, establish, alter, widen, straighten, vacate, or change the direction of roads within the county; they also provide that application for the said…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Bode v. WelchOhio Supreme Court · 1875
  2. Houpt v. DuttonIndiana Supreme Court · 1908
  3. Hull v. StephensonWashington Supreme Court · 1898

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. CabralesOhio Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Stuart v. KingSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1950
  3. Dennison v. Lake Cty. Commrs.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2014
  4. Wolf v. LordiOhio Court of Appeals · 1996
  5. Huron County Commissioners v. MiddleswarthOhio Court of Appeals · 1930

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API