State v. Ellis

MORRIS, Judge.

Defendant on appeal contends that he was under the influence of drugs at the time of the entering of his guilty pleas, and that he did not know what he was doing. The record clearly shows the facts to be to the contrary. The questions asked of defendant by the presiding judge were substantially the same as the ones asked in State v. Adams, 277 N.C. 427, 178 S.E. 2d 72 (1970), to determine whether the guilty pleas-were voluntarily, intelligently and understandingly made. In compliance with Boykin v. Alabama, 395 U.S. 238, 23 L. Ed. 2d 274, 89 S.Ct. 1709 (1969), this Court has…