Legal Opinion
United States v. Specialist MATTHEW D. BELL
Army Court of Criminal Appeals
Decided March 22, 2013No. ARMY 20100266PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
MARTIN, Judge:
A military judge sitting as a general court-martial convicted appellant, consistent with his pleas, of one specification of aggravated sexual assault of a child and one specification of abusive sexual contact with a child, in violation of Article 120, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 920 (2006 & Supp. I 2007) [hereinafter UCMJ]. Contrary to his pleas, a general court-martial composed of officer and enlisted members found appellant guilty of one specification of indecent acts or liberties with a child in violation of Article 134, UCMJ, 1 and found…
2Cases cited42 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- United States v. CottonSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- United States v. JorellUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 2014
- United States v. JorellUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 2013
- United States v. Sergeant First Class LAWSON L. HO-SHINGArmy Court of Criminal Appeals · 2017
- United States v. Staff Sergeant DAVID E. PADGETTArmy Court of Criminal Appeals · 2020