Legal Opinion

Butler-Kyser Manufacturing Co. v. Central of Georgia Ry. Co.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided December 17, 1914PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal from Coosa Circuit Court. Heard before Hon. S. L. Brewer. Detinue by the Butler-Kyser Manufacturing Company against the Central of Georgia Railway Company, for the recovery of certain cotton in specie, with claim thereto interposed by Weil Brothers. Judgment for claimants and plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtMayfield, J.

Appellant sued appellee in detinue to recover 64 bales of cotton. Appellee railway company suggested Weil Bros, as claimants, who did interpose claims to the cotton sued for as is authorized *647by statute. — Code 1907, §§ 3778-3792. The trial resulted in a judgment for the claimants, from which judgment plaintiff prosecutes this appeal.

The cotton in question was bought from various farmers who raised it, by a mercantile firm at Kelly-ton, Ala., and sold by this firm to a bank at Alexander City, Ala., and by the bank sold to Weil Bros., claimants, at Montgomery, Ala., and was in the possession of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Keyser v. Maas & SchwarzSupreme Court of Alabama · 1895
  2. Jones v. AndersonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1884
  3. Reese v. HarrisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1855
  4. Ballard v. Mayfield, Pitman & Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1894
  5. Hensley v. OrendorffSupreme Court of Alabama · 1907

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Gwin v. Emerald Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1918
  2. Smith v. Davenport & Co.Alabama Court of Appeals · 1915
  3. La Rue v. Loveman, Joseph & LoebSupreme Court of Alabama · 1929
  4. Crow v. BeckSupreme Court of Alabama · 1922
  5. Whatley v. TaylorSupreme Court of Alabama · 1924

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API