Spalti v. Blumer
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Appeal by defendants, Fredolin Blumer, Sebastian Blumer and Matilda Blumer, from a judgment of the District Court of Washington County, W. G. Williston, J., entered February 13, 1893, in favor of plaintiff, Joachim Spalti, for the recovery of the possession of the south west quarter of section thirty two (32) T. 30, B. 20, in that county and for $200 damages for its detention and for costs. By consent the action was tried before the court without a jury.
Read the full summary
Appeal by defendants, Fredolin Blumer, Sebastian Blumer and Matilda Blumer, from a judgment of the District Court of Washington County, W. G. Williston, J., entered February 13, 1893, in favor of plaintiff, Joachim Spalti, for the recovery of the possession of the south west quarter of section thirty two (32) T. 30, B. 20, in that county and for $200 damages for its detention and for costs. By consent the action was tried before the court without a jury. The court found that the defendant, Matilda Blumer wife of Sebastian Blumer had as against plaintiff no right or interest in the land and…
1Opinion of the CourtGileillan, C. J.
Action in ejectment against Fredolin and Sebastian Blumer, and Matilda, wife of Sebastian.
October 1, 1873, one Gardner owned the premises, and on that day conveyed the same to Fredolin and Sebastian, and at the same time they executed to him a mortgage thereon to secure $4,000, being part of the purchase price. December 27, 1876, the $4,000 then being in part due and wholly unpaid, by an agreement between him and them the time for payment of the $4,000 was extended; and thereupon they conveyed the premises to him, and he executed to them a written agreement, agreeing to convey to them on…
2Cited by2 opinions
- Haviland v. ChaseMichigan Supreme Court · 1898
- Fowler v. BracyMichigan Supreme Court · 1900