Woodward v. Emulex Corp.
District Court, D. Massachusetts
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ON DEFENDANTS’ AMENDED MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
RICHARD G. STEARNS, District Judge.
This is an unusual employment case. Plaintiff Frank Woodward’s former em*152ployer, defendant Emulex Corporation,1 admits that it may have made a mistake in terminating one of its most productive salesmen. What is lacking, however, is any evidence that the decision was motivated by discriminatory animus or improper purpose. Because the employment discrimination laws do not authorize federal courts to revise non-discriminatory personnel decisions, however much they may harm affected employees…
2Cases cited48 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Samuel Mesnick v. General Electric CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1991
- Desert Palace, Inc. v. CostaSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Woodward v. Emulex CorporationCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2013
- United States ex rel. Hagerty v. Cyberonics, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2015
- Lockwood v. MadeirosDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2020