Legal Opinion

Breedlove v. Stout

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided January 2, 2001No. 45792-6-IPublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAgid, C.J.

When an employee leaves his workplace in his own vehicle after his shift ends, but decides, without his *68employer’s knowledge or direction, to return to work to pick up a work-related manual he intends to study at home, he is not acting within the scope of employment while driving back to his workplace. His employer is therefore not vicariously liable for an accident he negligently causes en route.

FACTS

In late December 1995, after finishing his shift as a supervisor at Canfor U.S.A. Corporation’s lumber reprocessing mill, Donald Stout punched out, drove off the Canfor premises, and then…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Dickinson v. EdwardsWashington Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Claim of Neacosia v. New York Power AuthorityNew York Court of Appeals · 1995
  3. Aloha Lumber Corp. v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1970
  4. Wade v. Berkeley CountyCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1998
  5. Elder v. Cisco Construction Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1958

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Miller v. Monroe School DistrictDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2016
  2. Rahman v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 2011
  3. Rahman v. StateCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2009
  4. Rahman v. StateCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2009
  5. Kaye v. Lowe's HIW, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2010

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API