Joyner v. Adams
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
EAGLES, Judge.
I
Both parties argue that the trial court erred in concluding that there was no “meeting of the minds” on the rent escalation provision. Each contends that there is no evidentiary basis for finding the other party had a contrary intention. A trial court’s findings of fact, however, are conclusive on appeal if supported by competent evidence, Hill v. Town of Hillsborough, 48 N.C. App. 553, 269 S.E. 2d 303 (1980), and there is evidence here to support the trial court’s findings.
Plaintiff introduced three memoranda written during the negotiation process. One, written to Mr. Joyner…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Coble v. CobleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
- Williams v. Pilot Life Insurance CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
- Harris & Harris Construction Co. v. Crain & Denbo, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
- Root v. Allstate Insurance CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
- O'Grady v. First Union National BankSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Western Sling and Cable Co. v. HamiltonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1989
- Speedway Motorsports International Ltd. v. Bronwen Energy Trading, Ltd.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2011
- Wilkerson Ex Rel. Estate of Wilkerson v. NelsonDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2005
- Joyner v. AdamsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1990
- Segar v. AshcroftDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2006
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.