Legal Opinion
ADVANCED GYNECOLOGY AND LAPARASCOPY OF NORTH JERSEY, P.C. v. CIGNA HEALTH AND LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided June 25, 2024No. 2:19-cv-22234Unknown
1Opinion
Not for Publication UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY ADVANCED GYNECOLOGY AND LAPAROSCOPY OF NORTH JERSEY, P.C., et al.,, Civil Action No.: 19-22234 (ES) (MAH) Plaintiffs, OPINION v. CIGNA HEALTH AND LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, et al., Defendants. SALAS, DISTRICT JUDGE Plaintiffs in this matter1 bring claims pursuant to the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (“ERISA”),
29 U.S.C. § 1001
et seq.; the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (“RICO Act”) under
18 U.S.C. §§ 1962(c), 1962(d), and 1962(a)); and state contract law against Defendants Cigna Health and Life…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Phillips v. County of AlleghenyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008
- In Re Burlington Coat Factory Securities Litigation. P. Gregory Buchanan, Jacob Turner and Ronald AbramoffCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.