Legal Opinion

Cannon v. . Young

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided October 5, 1883PublishedCited by 4 opinions

■ EJECTMENT tried at Fall Term, 1883, of TRANSYLVANIA Superior Court, before Gudger, J. The plaintiffs appealed.

1Opinion of the Court

•Smith, C. J.

The parties to the action derive title to the land in controversy from the same source, claiming under one Joshua Orr, the former owner — the plaintiffs, by virtue of a sale under execution issued upon a judgment recovered by them as executors of Hugh Johnson, on September 9th, 1868, and docketed in the superior court of Transylvania; the defendant, under a deed executed by said Orr to him on September 10th, 1878.

It must be assumed that the defendant’s title was acquired under a deed made prior to the lien of the plaintiffs’ judgment, and must prevail unless successfully…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Reiger v. . DavisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1872
  2. Tredwell v. . GrahamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1883
  3. Doe on the Dem. of Lassiter v. DavisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1870
  4. Rencher v. . WynneSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1882

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Perry v. . HardisonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1888
  2. Lackett v. RumbaughU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western North Carolina · 1891
  3. Leadman v. . HarrisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1831
  4. Wooldridge v. IrvingUnited States Circuit Court · 1884

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API