Legal Opinion

Howard v. Western Maryland Railway Co.

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided February 5, 1921PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Baltimore City (Ambler,, J\).

1Opinion of the CourtUrner, J.

By permission of the municipal authorities the Western Maryland Railway Company occupies with its tracks the hed of Burén Street south of Terminal Street, in the City of Baltimore. To the east of Burén Street is Liberty Alley, which the city has allowed the railway company to' wholly appropriate for purposes connected with the use of its roundhouse and turntable located on the adjacent ground, of which it is the owner. The hill in this ease was filed by persons claiming to own the reversion in the street and alley just mentioned, and the object of tbe suit is to procure a mandatory injunction…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Oberheim v. ReesideCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1911
  2. Clayton v. ShoemakerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1887
  3. Whalen v. DalashmuttCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1883
  4. Gulick v. FisherCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1901
  5. Bernei v. SappingtonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1905

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Smith v. ShiebeckCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1942
  2. Kelliher v. Stone & Webster, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1935
  3. Libertini v. SchroederCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1926
  4. Haldas v. Commissioners of CharlestownCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1955
  5. Alaska Development Co. v. BrannanWyoming Supreme Court · 1929

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API