Legal Opinion

State ex inf. Taylor v. Whitford

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided November 13, 1950No. 42137PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtItyde, C. J.

[ 694] Quo warranto to determine the validity of the organization of a consolidated school district and to oust the individual defendants from the offices of school directors of the district. We have jurisdiction under Section 3, Article V of the Constitution, because this involves title to an office under this state. (State ex rel. Gentry v. Sullivan, 320 Mo. 362, 8 S. W. (2d) 616 and eases cited.) The Circuit Court found the proceedings invalid and entered a judgment of ouster against the directors of the district; and they have appealed.

The case was tried on agreed statement of facts, with…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Attorney-General v. SullivanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1928
  2. State Ex Rel. Consolidated School District No. 5 v. SmithSupreme Court of Missouri · 1945
  3. State Ex Inf. Attorney-General v. VickersSupreme Court of Missouri · 1928

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. Consolidated Sch. Dist. No. 4 of Iron CountySupreme Court of Missouri · 1967
  2. State ex inf. Taylor v. Pretended Consolidated School District No. 3Supreme Court of Missouri · 1951
  3. State v. Milan C-II School DistrictSupreme Court of Missouri · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API