State ex inf. Taylor v. Whitford
Supreme Court of Missouri
1Opinion of the CourtItyde, C. J.
[ 694] Quo warranto to determine the validity of the organization of a consolidated school district and to oust the individual defendants from the offices of school directors of the district. We have jurisdiction under Section 3, Article V of the Constitution, because this involves title to an office under this state. (State ex rel. Gentry v. Sullivan, 320 Mo. 362, 8 S. W. (2d) 616 and eases cited.) The Circuit Court found the proceedings invalid and entered a judgment of ouster against the directors of the district; and they have appealed.
The case was tried on agreed statement of facts, with…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Attorney-General v. SullivanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1928
- State Ex Rel. Consolidated School District No. 5 v. SmithSupreme Court of Missouri · 1945
- State Ex Inf. Attorney-General v. VickersSupreme Court of Missouri · 1928
3Cited by3 opinions
- State v. Consolidated Sch. Dist. No. 4 of Iron CountySupreme Court of Missouri · 1967
- State ex inf. Taylor v. Pretended Consolidated School District No. 3Supreme Court of Missouri · 1951
- State v. Milan C-II School DistrictSupreme Court of Missouri · 1969