Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Attorney-General v. Sullivan

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided June 21, 1928PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWalkejr, C. J.

This is ail original proceeding in quo warranto brought by the Attorney-General, as relator, against the respondents to test their authority to hold the offices and exercise the duties of •school directors of Common School District No. 15, Laclede County.

The contention of the relator is that District No. 15 has ceased to exist by being merged in and made a part of Consolidated School District No. 2, otherwise known as the Btoutland School District, Camden County, which rendered the offices of school directors of District No. 15 functus officio.

The respondents contend that the merger in…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Burnham v. RogersSupreme Court of Missouri · 1902
  2. Missouri State Life Insurance v. WittSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1923
  3. State Ex Inf. Otto v. HydeSupreme Court of Missouri · 1927
  4. State ex rel. O'Connell v. Board of President of St. Louis Public SchoolsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1892
  5. State Ex Inf. Attorney-General v. ParrishSupreme Court of Missouri · 1925

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. State on the Information of Mitchell v. HeathSupreme Court of Missouri · 1939
  2. State v. ColliverSupreme Court of Missouri · 1951
  3. State v. Pretended Consolidated School District Number OneSupreme Court of Missouri · 1949
  4. State v. NorthupSupreme Court of Missouri · 1963
  5. State Ex Inf. McKittrick v. WileySupreme Court of Missouri · 1942

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API