Legal Opinion

Barber v. Hartley

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided April 16, 1931PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBand, J.

On November 14,1923, defendants 0. S. Hartley and Margaret S. Hartley, Ms wife, mortgaged certain lands in WasMngton county to plaintiff to secure the payment of a promissory note for $1,750 given by them to plaintiff, which note was also executed by the defendant Bonser as an accommodation maker. Defendants defaulted in the payment of interest falling due under the terms of the note and also in failing to pay taxes on the land as provided in the mortgage. In the first complaint filed in tMs smt, the Hartleys only were named as defendants. After the filing of the first complaint and on March…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Overholser v. ClarkTennessee Supreme Court · 1850
  2. Smith v. . RobertsNew York Court of Appeals · 1883
  3. Watson v. Dundee Mortgage & Trust Investment Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1885
  4. Katz v. ObenchainOregon Supreme Court · 1906
  5. Farmers' State Bank v. ForsstromOregon Supreme Court · 1918

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Lothstein v. FitzpatrickOregon Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Baxter v. Redevco, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Calvary Baptist Church v. SaxtonOregon Supreme Court · 1926
  4. Butler & Thompson Co. v. HostettlerOregon Supreme Court · 1936
  5. Medford Pacific v. Danmor Construction, Inc.District Court, D. Oregon · 1998

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API