Legal Opinion

Laughlin v. Orthofix International, N.V.

District Court, D. Massachusetts

Decided April 10, 2013No. Civil Action No. 05-10557-EFHPublished

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

EDWARD F. HARRINGTON, Senior District Judge.

This matter comes before the Court on the Relator’s Motion Regarding Government Production of Documents Pursuant to Rule 45 Subpoena. Relator seeks to obtain confidential documents from the United States Attorney’s Office for the District of Massachusetts (the “Government”), which were produced in the course of an investigation of Defendants Smith & Nephew, DJO and ReAble Therapeutics into allegation similar to those raised in the instant action. The Government is not a party to the case.

The parties have not held a Rule 26(f) discovery…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. St. Louis Group, Inc. v. Metals & Additives Corp.District Court, S.D. Texas · 2011
  2. Notaro v. KochDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1982
  3. McMann v. DoeDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2006
  4. Momenta Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Teva Pharmaceuticals Industries Ltd.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2011
  5. Edgenet, Inc. v. Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API