Legal Opinion

In Re Estate of Moore

California Supreme Court

Decided November 20, 1918No. L. A. No. 5495PublishedCited by 10 opinions

APPEAL from an order of the Superior' Court of Los Angeles County denying the application of a father for his appointment as guardian of Ms cMld and appointing another. Chas. Wellborn, Judge. Reversed. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtSloss, J.

Opposing petitions for letters of guardiansMp of the person and estate of Phelps S. Moore, a minor, were filed by Charles Walter Moore, father of the child, and by Hugh T. Gordon. The petitions were heard together, and the court made its order denying the application of the father, and appointing Mr. Gordon guardian. The father appeals.

In addition to the petitions, there was on file a paper embodying the objections of Hugh T. Gordon to the petition oi Charles W. Moore for appointment. This document alleged the unfitness of the father and his abandonment of the child The court made no finding…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Guardianship of SnowballCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Matter of ForresterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
  3. Guardianship of SalterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  4. Guardianship v. MathewsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
  5. In Re Estate of AllenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Estate of Tetsubumi YanoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
  2. Guardianship of RutherfordCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
  3. Guardianship of PankeyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
  4. Lynn v. BensfieldCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
  5. Guardianship of MarshallCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API