Legal Opinion
Mystic Terminal Co. v. Thibeault
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
Decided January 18, 1940No. 3514PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PETERS, District Judge.
This is an appeal from an interlocutory decree in admiralty, determining the rights and liabilities of the parties, taken under authority of U.S.C., Title 28, Section 227, as amended, 28 U.S.C.A. § 227.
The District Court held respondent, The Mystic Terminal Company, liable for injuries sustained by the libellant when he stepped through the roof of a carfloat operated by that company while being taken by a tug, on which he was a mate, to be placed alongside a vessel in Boston Harbor.
The court held that the libellant was in the place where he got hurt by implied…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Continental Tie & Lumber Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Sun Oil Co. v. Dalzell Towing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Sun Oil Co. v. Dalzell Towing Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1932
- Hupfer v. National Distilling Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1902
- Burrell v. FlemingCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1901
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Jones v. Waterman SS CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1946
- Andrew C. Gooden, Jr. v. Sinclair Refining Company v. Texaco, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1967
- Gomes v. Eastern Gas and Fuel AssociatesDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1954
- United States v. The Tug ManzanilloDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1960
- Rogers v. STUYVESANT INSURANCE CO. OF NEW YORKLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1967
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.