Azar S. v. Social Security Administration
District Court, E.D. Michigan
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION AZAR S., Case No. 24-cv-13217 Plaintiff, Honorable Linda V. Parker Magistrate Judge Elizabeth A. Stafford v. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, Defendant. ORDER STRIKING SUR-REPLY AND AMENDED COMPLAINT (ECF NOS. 12, 17) Plaintiff Azar S., proceeding pro se, filed a sur-reply to the government’s motion to dismiss. ECF No. 12. But the general rule is that a non-moving party has no right to respond to a reply brief, and thus the applicable local rule does not allow for a sur-reply. Scottsdale Ins. Co. v. Flowers,
513 F.3d…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Scottsdale Insurance v. FlowersCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
- Liberty Legal Foundation v. National Democratic Party of the USA, Inc.District Court, W.D. Tennessee · 2012
- Ncmic Ins. Co. v. SmithDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2019