Legal Opinion

Azar S. v. Social Security Administration

District Court, E.D. Michigan

Decided December 18, 2025No. 2:24-cv-13217Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION AZAR S., Case No. 24-cv-13217 Plaintiff, Honorable Linda V. Parker Magistrate Judge Elizabeth A. Stafford v. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, Defendant. ORDER STRIKING SUR-REPLY AND AMENDED COMPLAINT (ECF NOS. 12, 17) Plaintiff Azar S., proceeding pro se, filed a sur-reply to the government’s motion to dismiss. ECF No. 12. But the general rule is that a non-moving party has no right to respond to a reply brief, and thus the applicable local rule does not allow for a sur-reply. Scottsdale Ins. Co. v. Flowers,

513 F.3d…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Scottsdale Insurance v. FlowersCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
  2. Liberty Legal Foundation v. National Democratic Party of the USA, Inc.District Court, W.D. Tennessee · 2012
  3. Ncmic Ins. Co. v. SmithDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API