Legal Opinion

Mogck v. Unum Life Insurance Co. of America

District Court, S.D. California

Decided September 16, 2003No. 3:99-cr-00201PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER GRANTING IN PART PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS’ FEES AND COSTS [DOC. NOS. 66, 80]

PAPAS, United States Magistrate Judge.

Plaintiff Kenneth Mogck has filed a motion for attorneys’ fees and costs in the above-captioned matter. 1 The Court has considered the arguments raised in the briefs and finds the matter suitable for decision without oral argument. See S.D. Cal. Civ. R. 7.1(d)(1). For the reasons set forth below, Plaintiffs motion is GRANTED IN PART.

I

BACKGROUND

The facts underlying this lawsuit arise from a March 25, 1993 motor vehicle accident in which Plaintiff sustained serious…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. City of Burlington v. DagueSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  3. Hummell v. S. E. Rykoff & Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
  4. Rufus E. Cunningham v. County of Los Angeles, and Richard Eiden, Real-Party-In-Interest-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
  5. Don Ray Smith v. Cmta-Iam Pension TrustCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Oklahoma Natural Gas Co. v. Apache Corp.District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 2004
  2. Lee v. Krystal Co.District Court, S.D. Alabama · 2013
  3. Carr v. Tadin, Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 2014
  4. Cortes v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2005
  5. Stokes v. Saga International Holidays, Ltd.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2005

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API