Legal Opinion
Koslowski v. Koslowski
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided September 30, 2002PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
It is well settled that where, as here, a case has been tried without a jury, this Court’s “power to review the evidence is as broad as that of the trial court, bearing in mind, of course, that *785due regard must be given to the decision of the Trial Judge who was in a position to assess the evidence and the credibility of the witnesses” (Universal Leasing Servs. v Flushing Hae Kwan Rest., 169 AD2d 829, 830). Moreover, the trial court’s determination will not generally be disturbed on appeal unless it could not have been reached under any fair interpretation of the evidence (see Greenberg v…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Universal Leasing Services, Inc. v. Flushing Hae Kwan RestaurantAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
- Greenberg v. BehlenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- Djamoos v. DjamoosAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
- Neos v. NeosAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
3Cited by6 opinions
- Salatino v. SalatinoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- Pyros v. DengelAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- Broderson v. ParsonsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- Neuhauser v. PolancoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- LaConti v. UrbanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.