United States v. Felton
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
WEIS, Circuit Judge.
Defendants contend that their Speedy Trial rights were violated because the district court used an excessively long time to decide their pretrial motions. After a careful review of the record, we conclude that under several different methods of computing excludable time, the limits of the Speedy Trial Act were not exceeded. To forestall possible delays contrary to the spirit of the Act, in future cases we recommend that district courts in this circuit adopt local rules setting time limits for the period between filing pretrial motions and hearings.…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Linkletter v. WalkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- United States v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- United States v. Schooner PeggySupreme Court of the United States · 1801
- Henderson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States v. Mitchell JanikCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1983
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- United States v. John Charles Richard MentzCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1988
- United States v. Craig ClaxtonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2014
- United States v. Arthur P. Tranakos, United States of America v. William PilgrimCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1990
- United States v. Rick K. VoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- United States v. Sears, Roebuck and Company, Inc., AKA Sears, AKA Sears & RoebuckCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.