Legal Opinion

Brink's, Inc. v. Herman

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided June 25, 1998No. 481, Docket 96—4162PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

LEVAL, Circuit Judge:

Brink’s Inc. (“Brinks”), an armored car delivery company, discharged the intervenor Joseph A. Caimano, a messenger in its employ, when he refused to go out on his daily run. Caimano filed a complaint with the U.S. Department of Labor, alleging that he was discharged for raising safety concerns and for refusing to work in an unsafe vehicle, and that his discharge therefore violated §§ 405(a) and (b) of the Surface Transportation Assistance Act of 1982 (“STAA”), 49 U.S.C. app. § 2305.1

A hearing was held before an Administrative Law Judge (“ALJ”) who found that Brinks had…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. National Labor Relations Board v. Columbian Enameling & Stamping Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1939
  2. Yellow Freight Systems, Inc. v. Robert B. Reich, Secretary of Labor, and John A. ThomCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
  3. Castle Coal & Oil Company, Inc. v. Robert B. Reich, Secretary of Labor, United States Department of LaborCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Brink's, Incorporated v. HermanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API