Legal Opinion

Sutton v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided June 7, 1995No. 1080-93Published

1Opinion of the Court

899 S.W.2d 682 (1995)

Daniel Charles SUTTON, Appellant,

v.

The STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 1080-93.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, En Banc.

June 7, 1995.

Martin Lenoir, Dallas, for appellant.

John Vance, Dist. Atty., Suzanne K. Perkins, Nancy Robb and David Nichols, Asst. Dist. Attys., Dallas, and Robert Huttash, State's Atty., Austin, for the State.

Before the Court en banc.

OPINION ON APPELLANT'S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW

MANSFIELD, Judge.

A jury found appellant, Daniel Charles Sutton, guilty of driving a motor vehicle in a public place while intoxicated with alcohol.[1] The trial court…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Almanza v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985
  2. Fisher v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1994
  3. State v. CarterCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1991
  4. Thomason v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1994
  5. Garcia v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1988

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API