Legal Opinion

William W. Bierce, Ltd. v. Waterhouse

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided November 6, 1909PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Error to Circuit Court, Pirst Circuit.

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OP THE COURT BY

PERRY, J.

This case was before us in April, 1909, on a bill of exceptions brought by the defendants. 19 Haw. 398. A full statement of the case will be found in our former opinion. The conclusion of that opinion and the order there contained was, “the exception to the overruling of defendants’ motion for judgment non obstante verdicto in so far as it is based upon their discharge from liability by the plaintiff’s amendments of value is sustained. The remaining grounds of the motion and the remaining exceptions not necessarily involved are not passed upon.” A petition for…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Supervisors v. KennicottSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  2. Stewart v. SalamonSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  3. Washington Bridge Co. v. StewartSupreme Court of the United States · 1845
  4. Browder v. McArthurSupreme Court of the United States · 1822
  5. Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. AndersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1893

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Solarana v. Industrial Electronics, Inc.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Scott v. Kona Development Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1913
  3. Hoomana Naauao O Hawaii ex rel. Maia v. MakekauHawaii Supreme Court · 1920
  4. Wall v. FockeHawaii Supreme Court · 1914
  5. Wong Wong v. Honolulu Skating Rink, Ltd.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1921

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API