Legal Opinion
City of Baton Rouge v. Rebowe
Supreme Court of Louisiana
Decided July 2, 1954No. 41801, 41802PublishedCited by 32 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FOURNET, Chief Justice.
The defendants in the above numbered and entitled cases, Joe Rebowe and Frank Messina, owners and operators of, respectively, the Harlem Bar and the McKinley Bar in the City of Baton Rouge, having been separately charged in the City Court of Baton Rouge with violating the provi sions of a City Ordinance in that he “did keep open for business or otherwise” until 1:20 a. m. (in the case of Rebowe) and 1:22 a. m. (in the case of Messina) on March 21, 1954, a Sunday, prosecute these appeals from their conviction and sentence, each having reserved a bill of exception to the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Schwegmann Bros. v. Louisiana Board of Alcoholic Beverage ControlSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1949
- State ex rel. Galle v. City of New OrleansSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1904
- State v. GardnerSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1941
- State Ex Rel. Sutton v. CaldwellSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1940
- City of De Ridder v. ManganoSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1936
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- Hi-Lo Oil Company v. City of CrowleyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1973
- Randolph v. Village of Turkey CreekSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1961
- Reynolds v. Louisiana Board of Alcoholic Beverage ControlSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1965
- City of Lafayette v. EliasSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1957
- Reynolds v. Louisiana Board of Alcoholic Beverage ControlSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1966
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.