Alcazar v. University of Utah Hospitals & Clinics
Court of Appeals of Utah
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BILLINGS, Judge:
{1 Plaintiffs Creseencio and Monica Alca-zar appeal the verdict from their jury trial, arguing that the trial court abused its diseretion in refusing to ask their requested voir dire questions concerning the prospective jurors' exposure to information about medical malpractice and tort reform issues. We reverse and remand for a new trial.
BACKGROUND
T2 Early in the morning on May 4, 2002, Mr. Alcazar went to the University of Utah Emergency Department (the Emergency Department) complaining of intermittent chest pain that had occurred over the prior three days, but stated…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Barrett v. PetersonCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1993
- Evans by and Through Evans v. DotyCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1991
3Cited by9 opinions
- State v. StilesMontana Supreme Court · 2008
- Boyle v. ChristensenCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2009
- State v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2018
- State v. HolmCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2017
- State v. AlvarezCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2014
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.