Legal Opinion

State v. Holm

Court of Appeals of Utah

Decided August 10, 2017No. 20150623-CAPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

POHLMAN, Judge:

¶ 1 During his- early morning commute Carl John Holm drove through a red traffic light and collided with an,oncoming vehicle, fatally injuring the vehicle’s passenger (Victim). Following a jury trial Holm was convicted of negligent homicide. On appeal Holm asserts that, during voir dire, the trial court should have permitted follow-up questioning of jurors who indicated they or someone close to them had been involved in a serious car accident. We conclude that the trial court exceeded its discretion by precluding such questioning, and we therefore reverse Holm’s…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. State v. SaundersUtah Supreme Court · 1999
  2. State v. ReeceUtah Supreme Court · 2015
  3. State v. KingUtah Supreme Court · 2006
  4. State v. MeadUtah Supreme Court · 2001
  5. State v. BallUtah Supreme Court · 1984

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2018
  2. State v. HolmCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2020
  3. Lee v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2018
  4. State v. GarzaCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API