Fisk v. Thorp
Nebraska Supreme Court
Error to the district court for Sioux county. ■ Tried below before Westover, J.
1Opinion of the CourtHolcomb, J.
' We are asked in this case to review the proceeding had in the district court on a motion to set aside and vacate a deficiency judgment rendered against defendants in error, and reverse the order entered sustaining such motion. The motion was filed after the term at which the judgment was rendered, and the application is made under the provisions of subdivision 8, section 602, of the . Civil Code, on the ground of “irregularity in obtaining a judgment.”
By error proceeding, from a similar order of the trial court on the same motion, the case has once before been here for review. In the…
2Cited by7 opinions
- Clawson v. Boston Acme Mines Development Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1928
- Board of Com'rs v. District Court of Fourth Judicial Dist.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1924
- Fowler v. Continental Casualty Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1912
- Wooden v. WoodenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
- Tootle-Weakley Millinery Co. v. BillingsleyNebraska Supreme Court · 1905
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.