Fulton Bag & Cotton Mills v. Haynie
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtBeoyles, C. J.
1. In a claim for compensation under the workmen’s compensation act the burden is on the claimant to show that the injury to the employee arose both in the course of the employment and out of the employment. Union Sanitary Mfg. Co. v. Davis, 64 Ind. App. 227 (115 N. E. 676).
2. Under the provisions of the workmen’s compensation act a claimant is not entitled to compensation where the injury to the deceased employee was the result of a fight between him and a fellow employee in which the deceased employee was the aggressor. In such a case the injury was not an accident arising out of the…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Jacquemin v. Turner & Seymour Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1918
- Union Sanitary Manufacturing Co. v. DavisIndiana Court of Appeals · 1917
- Claim of Griffin v. A. Roberson & SonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1916
- Farmers Manufacturing Co. v. WarfelSupreme Court of Virginia · 1926
3Cited by18 opinions
- Stephens v. Spuck Iron & Foundry Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1948
- Kimbro v. Black & White Cab Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1934
- Roberts v. Lockheed Aircraft Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1956
- Scott v. Travelers InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1934
- Armstead, Widow, Etc. v. Sommer, Etc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1956
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.