Legal Opinion
Crain v. Hill Resources, Inc.
Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma
Decided August 31, 1998No. 89512PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HANSEN, J.
¶ 1 Defendant/Appellants (Lessees) seek review of the trial court’s order canceling their oil and gas leases with Plaintiff/Appel-lees (Lessors). .Lessors entered the leases with Lessees’ predecessors in interest in 1978 and 1979. Lessees acquired the leases by assignment and drilled two gas wells: the Drummond 31-1 Well, which was completed on October 21, 1979, and the Drummond 32-1 Well, which was completed on March 5, 1980. The wells were never hooked up to a pipeline. On June 3, 1994, Lessors filed suit to cancel the leases on the grounds neither well was capable of…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- McVicker v. Horn, Robinson & NathanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1958
- James Energy Co. v. HCG Energy Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1993
- Indian Territory Illuminating Oil Co. v. Haynes Drilling Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
- McKenna v. NichlosSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1944
- Hitt v. HendersonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Stirman v. Exxon CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2002
- Concorde Resources Corp. v. Kepco Energy, Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2011
- Trustees of the Charles Page Family Care Charitable Remainder Annuity Trust v. SiegelCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2001