Legal Opinion

BRADLEY MOORHEAD, II v. OFFICER RAUL HERNANDEZ, et al.

District Court, E.D. California

Decided September 22, 2026No. 2:24-cv-00344Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 BRADLEY MOORHEAD, II, No. 2:24-cv-00344-TLN-SCR 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 14 OFFICER RAUL HERNANDEZ, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff is proceeding pro se in this civil rights action, which asserts claims under 42

18 U.S.C. §1983

and state law arising from a law enforcement encounter in Manteca in December 19 2022. As Plaintiff is proceeding pro se, this matter is referred to the undersigned pursuant to 20 Local Rule 302(c)(21) and 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Now before…

2Cases cited48 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  5. Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API