Legal Opinion

Preston v. Gibson

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided December 7, 2000No. 00-7069PublishedCited by 219 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LUCERO, Circuit Judge.

Appellant Gary Ray Preston, an Oklahoma state prisoner appearing pro se, seeks a certificate of appealability (“COA”) after the district court dismissed his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 habeas petition as untimely. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c). Preston’s petition asserts that his conviction of second-degree murder violated the Double Jeopardy Clause of the United States Constitution and that his counsel was ineffective in failing to so inform him before he pleaded guilty. 1

In 1992, while serving unrelated sentences in an Oklahoma state prison, Preston and three co-defendants murdered…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hudson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  2. Miller v. MarrCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998
  3. Allan Hoggro v. Bobby Boone, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998
  4. State v. CampbellCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1998
  5. Worthen v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1998

3Cited by219 opinions

  1. Fisher v. GibsonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2001
  2. Klein v. FranklinCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2011
  3. Ketchum v. ParkerDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 2008
  4. Adams (ID 117388) v. ButlerDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2022
  5. Alberty v. RankinsDistrict Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 2024

214 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API