Preston v. Gibson
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
LUCERO, Circuit Judge.
Appellant Gary Ray Preston, an Oklahoma state prisoner appearing pro se, seeks a certificate of appealability (“COA”) after the district court dismissed his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 habeas petition as untimely. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c). Preston’s petition asserts that his conviction of second-degree murder violated the Double Jeopardy Clause of the United States Constitution and that his counsel was ineffective in failing to so inform him before he pleaded guilty. 1
In 1992, while serving unrelated sentences in an Oklahoma state prison, Preston and three co-defendants murdered…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Hudson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Miller v. MarrCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998
- Allan Hoggro v. Bobby Boone, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998
- State v. CampbellCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1998
- Worthen v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1998
3Cited by219 opinions
- Fisher v. GibsonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2001
- Klein v. FranklinCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2011
- Ketchum v. ParkerDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 2008
- Adams (ID 117388) v. ButlerDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2022
- Alberty v. RankinsDistrict Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 2024
214 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.