Legal Opinion

Amusement Indus., Inc. v. Stern

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided January 5, 2018No. 17-339-cvUnpublished

1Opinion of the Court

17-339-cv Amusement Indus., Inc. v. Stern UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT SUMMARY ORDER RULINGS BY SUMMARY ORDER DO NOT HAVE PRECEDENTIAL EFFECT. CITATION TO A SUMMARY ORDER FILED ON OR AFTER JANUARY 1, 2007, IS PERMITTED AND IS GOVERNED BY FEDERAL RULE OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE 32.1 AND THIS COURT’S LOCAL RULE 32.1.1. WHEN CITING A SUMMARY ORDER IN A DOCUMENT FILED WITH THIS COURT, A PARTY MUST CITE EITHER THE FEDERAL APPENDIX OR AN ELECTRONIC DATABASE (WITH THE NOTATION “SUMMARY ORDER”). A PARTY CITING A SUMMARY ORDER MUST SERVE A COPY OF IT ON ANY PARTY NOT REPRESENTED…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Orville Cephas v. John Nash, Warden, Ray Brook Federal Correctional InstitutionCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2003
  2. Davis v. New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002
  3. Townsend v. BENJAMIN ENTERPRISES, INC.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2012
  4. Doctor Fred L. Pasternack v. Laboratory Corporation of America HoldingsNew York Court of Appeals · 2016
  5. Proctor v. LeClaireCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2013

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API