Legal Opinion
Russell L. Sterling and William M. Fairbanks v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided July 20, 1964No. 18850PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HAMLIN, Circuit Judge.
Appellants Sterling and Fairbanks were each convicted by a jury in the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington of (1) having stolen six cases of Black & White Scotch Whisky from a shipment in foreign commerce and (2) having these six cases in their possession knowing them to have been stolen, all in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 659 (1958). Jurisdiction of this court is based on 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (1958). Appellants complain that: (1) The indictment was not a sufficiently definite statement of the essential facts of the offenses charged; (2) the…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Nye & Nissen v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Hagner v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Tad R. Knowles v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1955
- Baker v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1940
- United States v. William WrightCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1962
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- State v. SimoneSupreme Court of Missouri · 1967
- United States v. Arthur Wilson Cousins, United States of America v. Joe Armenta GanoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1970
- United States v. Domenick CasalinuovoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1965
- Harris Calvin Jacobs v. United States of America, Burton S. Wolcoff v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1968
- United States v. Raymond MaddoxCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1968
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.