Legal Opinion

Diehl v. Butts

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided April 17, 1998No. Record 971090PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Elassell

I

The primary issue that we consider in this appeal of a judgment entered in a medical malpractice action is whether Code § 8.01-397, commonly referred to as the dead man’s statute, barred the admission of the defendant’s testimony.

n.

Susan Gale Knight Dunlap filed this action as the wife and guardian for Francis Joseph Dunlap, Sr., incompetent, against Dr. Edward B. Butts, alleging that he breached the standard of care owed to her husband. At a jury trial, the litigants adduced the following evidence which is relevant to our disposition of this appeal.

Mr. Dunlap fell from his bicycle and…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. James v. JaneSupreme Court of Virginia · 1980
  2. Nicholson v. ShockeySupreme Court of Virginia · 1951
  3. Limbaugh v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1927
  4. Lawrence v. WirthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1983
  5. Hereford v. PaytesSupreme Court of Virginia · 1984

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Rice v. CharlesSupreme Court of Virginia · 2000
  2. Virginia Home for Boys & Girls v. PhillipsSupreme Court of Virginia · 2010
  3. Shumate v. MitchellSupreme Court of Virginia · 2018
  4. Williams v. ConditSupreme Court of Virginia · 2003
  5. Ayers v. ShafferSupreme Court of Virginia · 2013

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API