White Haven Boro. v. Public Service Commission
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Appeals, Nos. 4 and 5, May T., 1924, by plaintiffs, from judgments of Superior Court, Nos. 15 and 16, March T., 1923, affirming order of Public Service Commission in cases of White Haven Borough and F. O. Haiges v. White Haven Water Co. Appeals from judgments of Superior Court affirming order of Public Service Commission. See White Haven Boro. v. Public Service Commission, 80 Pa. Superior Ct. 536, for the facts. Order affirmed.
Read the full summary
Appeals, Nos. 4 and 5, May T., 1924, by plaintiffs, from judgments of Superior Court, Nos. 15 and 16, March T., 1923, affirming order of Public Service Commission in cases of White Haven Borough and F. O. Haiges v. White Haven Water Co. Appeals from judgments of Superior Court affirming order of Public Service Commission. See White Haven Boro. v. Public Service Commission, 80 Pa. Superior Ct. 536, for the facts. Order affirmed. White Haven Borough and F. O. Haiges, plaintiffs, appealed. Error assigned was judgment, quoting it.
1Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam,
These appeals involve identical points; they were presented together and will be so disposed of here.
The two opinions of Judge Henderson, in Staples v. Public Service Commission, 79 Pa. Superior Ct. 6, and Borough of White Haven v. Public Service Commission, 80 Pa. Superior Ct. 536, sufficiently cover all the points in controversy, and, after studying the arguments of counsel for complainants, we think that nothing can be profitably added to what has already been so well stated by the Superior Court.
The judgments are affirmed.
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Borough of White Haven v. Public Service CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1923
- Staples v. Public Service CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
3Cited by2 opinions
- Scranton Electric Co. v. Avoca Borough School DistrictSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
- Martin Estate, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lancaster County1974