Legal Opinion

United States v. Nicklas

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided November 5, 2010No. 09-3784PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RILEY, Chief Judge.

Charged with transmitting in interstate commerce a threatening communication, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 875(c), the district court1 found David Eugene Nicklas incompetent to stand trial. The district court ordered that Nicklas be involuntarily medicated in order to restore his competency. Nicklas appeals. We have jurisdiction over interlocutory appeals of orders for involuntary medication under the collateral order doctrine. See Sell v. United States, 539 U.S. 166, 177, 123 S.Ct. 2174, 156 L.Ed.2d 197 (2003). We affirm.

I. BACKGROUND

In September 2007, Nicklas was convicted…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Begay v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
  2. Sell v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  3. United States v. Merle Left Hand BullCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1990
  4. United States v. WhiteCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2010
  5. United States v. FazioCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2010

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. United States v. Jesse GutierrezCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2013
  2. United States v. DiazCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2011
  3. United States v. Charles Gillenwater, IICourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
  4. United States v. Gary MikulichCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2013
  5. United States v. Shawn MackeyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2013

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API