United States v. Ochoa-Heredia
District Court, N.D. Iowa
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM SENTENCING OPINION
BENNETT, Chief Judge.
[[Image here]]
[[Image here]]
In the course of interpreting certain language in 38 U.S.C. § 445, Justice William 0. Douglas observed, “[Common sense often makes good law.” Peak v. United States, 353 U.S. 43, 46, 77 S.Ct. 613, 1 L.Ed.2d 631 (1957). This court believes that common sense also makes good law in the interpretation of 21 U.S.C. § 841, where a defendant’s mandatory minimum sentence for possession of methamphetamine with intent to distribute it under § 841 depends upon whether the court “counts” the weight of over 3,000 grams of a toxic…
2Cases cited64 opinions
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- United States v. Ron Pair Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Chapman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Baxstrom v. HeroldSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Estate of Cowart v. Nicklos Drilling Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Iowa Protection & Advocacy Services, Inc. v. Gerard Treatment Programs, L.L.C.District Court, N.D. Iowa · 2001
- Kinkaid v. John Morrell & Co.District Court, N.D. Iowa · 2004
- Seals v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2005
- Seals v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2005
- Seals, Ronald ClydeCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2005