Legal Opinion

United States v. Ochoa-Heredia

District Court, N.D. Iowa

Decided January 3, 2001No. CR 99-4069-MWBPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM SENTENCING OPINION

BENNETT, Chief Judge.

[[Image here]]

[[Image here]]

In the course of interpreting certain language in 38 U.S.C. § 445, Justice William 0. Douglas observed, “[Common sense often makes good law.” Peak v. United States, 353 U.S. 43, 46, 77 S.Ct. 613, 1 L.Ed.2d 631 (1957). This court believes that common sense also makes good law in the interpretation of 21 U.S.C. § 841, where a defendant’s mandatory minimum sentence for possession of methamphetamine with intent to distribute it under § 841 depends upon whether the court “counts” the weight of over 3,000 grams of a toxic…

2Cases cited64 opinions

  1. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. United States v. Ron Pair Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. Chapman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  4. Baxstrom v. HeroldSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  5. Estate of Cowart v. Nicklos Drilling Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992

59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Iowa Protection & Advocacy Services, Inc. v. Gerard Treatment Programs, L.L.C.District Court, N.D. Iowa · 2001
  2. Kinkaid v. John Morrell & Co.District Court, N.D. Iowa · 2004
  3. Seals v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2005
  4. Seals v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2005
  5. Seals, Ronald ClydeCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API