Seals v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Dissent
COCHRAN, J.,
dissenting, in which JOHNSON and HOLCOMB, JJ., joined
I respectfully dissent. I think that the court of appeals got it exactly right.1 “Common sense often makes good law.”2 The evidence in this case showed that the blood-methamphetamine mixture in the vial found by appellant’s bed is “waste” product. It is not a mixture in which adulterants or dilutants have increased the bulk of the controlled substance.
I think that the “plain language” of the statute is clear: only those adulterants and dilutants which increase the bulk of the controlled substance before their distribution, sale,…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Chapman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Texas Department of Transportation v. NeedhamTexas Supreme Court · 2002
- Neal v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Guthery v. Taylor, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2003
- United States v. Wayne Eugene Walker and Joe Guerra, United States of America v. Robert BouvierCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1992
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.