Legal Opinion · Dissent

Seals v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided November 16, 2005No. PD-0678-04Published

1Dissent

COCHRAN, J.,

dissenting, in which JOHNSON and HOLCOMB, JJ., joined

I respectfully dissent. I think that the court of appeals got it exactly right.1 “Common sense often makes good law.”2 The evidence in this case showed that the blood-methamphetamine mixture in the vial found by appellant’s bed is “waste” product. It is not a mixture in which adulterants or dilutants have increased the bulk of the controlled substance.

I think that the “plain language” of the statute is clear: only those adulterants and dilutants which increase the bulk of the controlled substance before their distribution, sale,…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Chapman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. Texas Department of Transportation v. NeedhamTexas Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Neal v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  4. Guthery v. Taylor, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2003
  5. United States v. Wayne Eugene Walker and Joe Guerra, United States of America v. Robert BouvierCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1992

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API