Legal Opinion
People v. Proctor
California Supreme Court
Decided December 28, 1992No. S004555. Crim. 23185PublishedCited by 160 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
GEORGE, J.
Following the guilt phase of a jury trial held in Shasta County, defendant William Arnold Proctor was found guilty of various offenses committed against Mrs. Bonita Stendal: first degree murder (Pen. Code, §§ 187, 189),1 forcible rape (§ 261, subd. (2)), and first degree burglary (§ 460). The jury also found that defendant inflicted great bodily injury (§ 12022.8), and found true the special circumstance allegations that he committed the murder in the course of rape (§ 190.2, subd. (a)(17)(iii)), in the course of first degree burglary (§ 190.2, subd. (a)(17)(vii)), and with…
2Cases cited93 opinions
- Estelle v. McGuireSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- People v. WatsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
- Payne v. TennesseeSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Penry v. LynaughSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Jurek v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
88 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by160 opinions
- Tuilaepa v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- People v. OsbandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
- People v. StanleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
- People v. ColeCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
- People v. CunninghamCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
155 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.