Fox v. Coughlin
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
1Per curiam
This appeal considers the Due Process Clause as it relates to one aspect of a prison disciplinary hearing. The district court held that a prison official’s failure to assist an inmate in preparing a defense to disciplinary charges and a prison hearing officer’s failure to grant an inmate’s request to produce two correctional officers at the disciplinary hearing did not violate 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1982). The district court stated that Fox had no clearly established right to assistance in preparing his defense or to the interview of two additional witnesses. Hence, it concluded that his claim was…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Anderson v. CreightonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Gary Wayne Freeman v. Richard RideoutCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1986
- Ponte v. RealSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- Lee v. CoughlinDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1995
- Elder v. McCarthyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2020
- Ervan Purnell v. Elaine A. Lord, Walter E. KellyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1992
- McHugh v. University of VermontDistrict Court, D. Vermont · 1991
- Ayers v. RyanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.