Legal Opinion

Scicutella v. Town of Hempstead

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided October 22, 2001PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (DiNoto, J.), dated June 14, 2000, which denied his motion pursuant to CPLR 4404 (a) to set aside the jury verdict in favor of the defendants and for a new trial on the issue of damages.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

A verdict in favor of a defendant should not be set aside unless the evidence preponderates so heavily in the plaintiffs favor that the verdict could not have been reached on any fair interpretation of the evidence (see, Lolik v Big V…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Lolik v. Big v. Supermarkets, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1995
  2. Gray v. McParlandAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  3. Grossman v. Town of HempSteadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
  4. Lenhart v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Candia v. Omonia Cab Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
  2. David v. EZ Rate Rental Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API