Legal Opinion
Grundlehner v. Dangler
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Decided March 2, 1959PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
29 N.J. 256 (1959)
148 A.2d 806
ELISE L. GRUNDLEHNER ET AL., PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS,
v.
J. HENRY DANGLER ET AL., DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.
The Supreme Court of New Jersey.
Argued January 19, 1959.
Decided March 2, 1959.
Mr. Lawrence A. Carton, Jr., argued the cause for the defendant-appellant J. Henry Dangler (Messrs. Roberts, Pillsbury & Carton, attorneys).
Mr. William C. Nowels argued the cause for the plaintiffs-respondents (Messrs. Mirne and Nowels, attorneys).
The opinion of the court was delivered by JACOBS, J.
The Appellate Division, in an opinion reported at 51 N.J. Super. 53 (1958), set aside a…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited64 opinions
- Schmidt v. BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT, CITY OF NEWARKSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1952
- Ward v. ScottSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1952
- Jones v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
- Ward v. ScottSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1954
- Duffcon Concrete Products, Inc. v. Borough of CresskillSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1949
59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- ISKOS. v. Planning Bd. of Tp. of LivingstonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1968
- Pieretti v. Mayor and Council of Town of BloomfieldSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1961