Legal Opinion

Farris v. Tvedten

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided November 2, 1981No. 81-127PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Darrell Hickman, Justice.

The issue in this case is whether a defamatory letter was “published.” The trial court granted a motion to dismiss holding that there had been no publication of the letter. For purpose of argument it has to be conceded that the letter was libelous.

The appellant, Mrs. Louise Bariola Farris, is a nurse who practices at the Chicot Memorial Hospital in Lake Village. The appellee, Tom H. Tvedten, is a doctor who practices at the same hospital. Dr. Tvedten dictated the letter in question to a stenographer. It was addressed to Mrs. Farris at Box 16, Jennie, Arkansas. The…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Bohlinger v. Germania Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1911
  2. Braman and the Gus Blass Co. v. WalthallSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1949
  3. Weidman v. KetchamNew York Court of Appeals · 1938
  4. Polk v. Missouri Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1922
  5. Arkansas Associated Telephone Co. v. BlankenshipSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1947

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Bearden v. International Paper Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2008
  2. Ihebereme v. Capital One, N.A.District Court, District of Columbia · 2010
  3. Richmond v. Southwire Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1992
  4. Navorro-Monzo v. HughesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1989
  5. Roleson v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1982

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API