Legal Opinion

Sulkowski v. Zynda

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided February 3, 1910No. Docket No. 3PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Error to Wayne; Donovan, J. Trespass vi et armis by Joseph Sulkowski against John Zynda. A judgment for plaintiff is reviewed by defendant on writ of error.

1Opinion of the CourtMcAlvay, J.

Plaintiff recovered a judgment against defendant upon a verdict of a jury for personal injuries claimed to have been inflicted upon him by defendant by a violent assault made upon him. Defendant has brought the case here upon a writ of error for review. Defendant admits that no importance attaches to the manner in which the altercation occurred, “ as the conflicting testimony in regard to it was properly submitted to the jury, and there is no assignment of error as to that part of the *8testimony. ” A statement of facts is therefore unnecessary.

The errors assigned which are relied upon are:(1)…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Detroit City Railway v. MillsMichigan Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Riggs v. SterlingMichigan Supreme Court · 1886
  3. Barhyte v. SummersMichigan Supreme Court · 1888

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Templeton v. C. & W. C. Ry. Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1921
  2. Ilins v. BurnsMichigan Supreme Court · 1972
  3. People v. NemerMichigan Supreme Court · 1922
  4. State v. RandallSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1919

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API